So, I guess it's Saturday --- And I realized Statement of Claim.
www.HowToWinInCourt.com? refercode=MK0040
Case-Winning Paperwork ... Part 1Want to drive your opponents nuts? Tie them down with word-power! Stuff your opponents in a word-box! Many pro se people don't understand this ... so they lose ... needlessly. Many lawyers don't understand ... so they also lose and take their client's money anyway! Sentences with ONE VERB. Sentences with ONE SUBJECT. One subject. One verb. Keep adjectives and adverbs to a bare minimum. If it's important to say your opponent's nose was gigantic, say so. Otherwise, leave it out! Each sentence is a complete thought. Mrs. Edgerton taught that in First Grade, and it wins in court today. No run-on sentences! Know how to write proper case-winning paperwork. What legal principles is my claim based on? www.HowToWinInCourt.com? |
Free Course Preview
The plaintiff prepares a statement of claim, which contains a concise statement of material facts on which the plaintiff relies. The court issues the statement of claim after the court fees are paid.
The plaintiff serves the statement of claim on all defendants and files an affidavit of service with the court.
If the defendant does not defend the action, this affidavit of service is necessary for the plaintiff to obtain default judgment.
Form 14A
Courts of Justice Act
statement of claim (general)
(General heading)
(Court seal)
statement of claim
TO THE DEFENDANT
A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED AGAINST YOU by the plaintiff. The claim made against you is set out in the following pages.
IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, you or an Ontario lawyer acting for you must prepare a statement of defence in Form 18A prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the plaintiff’s lawyer or, where the plaintiff does not have a lawyer, serve it on the plaintiff, and file it, with proof of service in this court office, WITHIN TWENTY DAYS after this statement of claim is served on you, if you are served in Ontario.
If you are served in another province or territory of Canada or in the United States of America, the period for serving and filing your statement of defence is forty days. If you are served outside Canada and the United States of America, the period is sixty days.
Instead of serving and filing a statement of defence, you may serve and file a notice of intent to defend in Form 18B prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure. This will entitle you to ten more days within which to serve and file your statement of defence.
IF YOU FAIL TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, JUDGMENT MAY BE GIVEN AGAINST YOU IN YOUR ABSENCE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU. IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING BUT ARE UNABLE TO PAY LEGAL FEES, LEGAL AID MAY BE AVAILABLE TO YOU BY CONTACTING A LOCAL LEGAL AID OFFICE.
(Where the claim made is for money only, include the following:)
IF YOU PAY THE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM, and $...................... for costs, within the time for serving and filing your statement of defence you may move to have this proceeding dismissed by the court. If you believe the amount claimed for costs is excessive, you may pay the plaintiff’s claim and $400 for costs and have the costs assessed by the court.
Date ........................................................................... Issued by ...........................................................................
Local registrar
Address of
court office .........................................................................
.........................................................................
TO (Name and address of each defendant)
(In an action under the simplified procedure provided in Rule 76, add:)
THIS ACTION IS BROUGHT AGAINST YOU UNDER THE SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE PROVIDED IN RULE 76 OF THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
claim
1. The plaintiff claims: (State here the precise relief claimed.)
(Then set out in separate, consecutively numbered paragraphs each allegation of material fact relied on to substantiate the claim.)
(Where the statement of claim is to be served outside Ontario without a court order, set out the facts and the specific provisions of Rule 17 relied on in support of such service.)
(Date of issue) (Name, address and telephone number of solicitor or plaintiff)
RCP-E 14A (November 1, 2005)
Steven Truscott is certainly not the first convicted killer to try and clear his name, and some of those who’ve come before him have been successful.
Truscott decided to emerge from the shadows of anonymity in 2000 to prove his innocence and the Association in Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted, which helped exonerate Guy Paul Morin and David Milgaard, took up his case.
Here’s a look at some cases of wrongful convictions in Canada:
David Milgaard
This is probably one of the most famous cases in Canadian history. David Milgaard was convicted of murdering 22-year-old nursing assistant Gail Miller in 1969 in Saskatoon.
Miller was raped and stabbed to death.
Milgaard was released from prison in 1992 and due to evidence obtained from DNA testing arranged by the Association in Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted, he was exonerated in 1997.
Milgaard’s mother played a big role in this case. After he was denied parole in 1979 she began to uncover evidence of false testimony and police malpractice, according to AIDWYC. She also came across information that suggested that Larry Fisher, who’d been convicted for a series of sex assaults, could be responsible for the crime.
The DNA testing that proved Milgaard’s innocence also convicted Fisher. Milgaard spent 23 years in prison for the crime.
Guy Paul Morin
Morin was given a life sentence in 1992 for the murder of nine-year-old Christine Jessop, who disappeared from her home in Queensville, Ont. home in 1984. She was sexually assaulted and murdered.
DNA testing proved Morin’s innocence and he was exonerated in 1995.
Thomas Sophonow
Sophonow was convicted of the 1983 murder of Barbara Stoppel. He was convicted in 1985. The Manitoba Court of Appeal acquitted him in 1985 and in 2000 Winnipeg police announced that DNA had exonerated him. He received $2.6 million in compensation.
Donald Marshall Jr.
At the age of 17 Marshall was sentenced to life in prison for the murder of Sandy Seale.
The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal acquitted him in 1983 and a Royal Commission was established to question the prosecution of the case. A 1990 inquiry was also held to investigate the judges that heard the case.
Marshall received $250,000 in compensation from the government of Nova Scotia as compensation for his wrongful conviction. He spent 11 years in jail.
For a look at other cases in which convicted criminals are fighting to clear their names,


Comments
Post a Comment